The Elements of Knavery: Made by Valforex
A few days
ago I came across a curious article and was quite surprised. It was called “Profit Booster App Scam: Don’t Buy Into
The Hype, Read Our Review First!” I found it rather intriguingly. Someone
in the comments below said that it was time to write the analogous review about
Valforex. I used to hark the requests, so I accepted the challenge. However, I
did the opposite – I’ve been using Profit Booster App and only then read the
unmasking text. It was expected that the disrobing article would change my
point of view radically, but unfortunately I didn’t find any shocking facts or
weighty arguments. No accusatory screenshots either.
So what’s the point of
writing such “revealing” articles? Where are the evidence and other formidable
things which will really stop people from using the product? Otherwise this
article looks like an absolute nonsense. I would even say “rubbish”, but out of
regard for the author I didn’t do it, just because I know that writing reviews
is a meticulous painstaking job. But it would be even more painstaking if the
author took the trouble to provide direct evidence. Unfortunately, it is easy
to see there is no such evidence there. It is written on the author’s bare word.
The text is very unfounded – what to believe here? Should anyone believe
someone’s words and only words? Likewise, there are other accusations which
look just ridiculous. For example, it is said that Profit Booster collects its
users’ data (but the reasons are not disclosed yet). Why should it collect the
data? I have no idea. And I must confess when I saw this accusation I even lost
courage for a moment.
I really
didn’t know how to prove otherwise because the accusation was really absurd and
I couldn’t even imagine that one day I would hear it. I could accept many
things and charges, but I wasn’t ready for such blatant poppycock. I could
retell you the whole text in a few words: “Profit Booster is a crap. Why? Who
knows. The end.” So I must remind you to be objective, humble and perceive
information selectively, not soaking it up like a sponge.
The author surely has
the untrammeled right to find the app risky or shady, or to doubt in huge sums
of money, or stumble at some technical nuances. Or, at the worst, just impugn
the trading applications and robot trading on the whole. Why not? Some people
don’t trust machine traders and want to control the process on their own. Some
impugn the possibility of making money so fast, being accustomed to hard and
exhausting work. But does he have the right to express the baseless unwarranted
doubts, baffling the others? I don’t think so.
The next
chapter which amused me a lot was about “bold promises” and “being too good to
be true”. Why these promises of earning huge sums are bold? What do you want to
see? Accounts, invoices, people giving testimony about their income alive?
There are already a number of reviews about Profit Booster and I think it means
something. And it is despite the fact the app is only four months old. Yes, the
author finds the age of the app suspicious either. Maybe he expected to see the
app which would have been of advanced age at the first onset. I don’t know, and
again, I’m confused. All things are new at the very beginning, everyone knows
it.
Profit
Booster does not advertise its users and their results of trading. Comments
written by users are the best advertisement.
Those who don’t mind to impersonate always can tell their story. But
it’s the choice of a user only. The administration of the site has no right to
do it at their discretion.
The
creators of the app also prefer to stay in the background similar to people who
disrupted the jack pot and now enjoying life. If their pictures do not adorn
the headlines and rotate on TV, it doesn’t mean they are not real. It was their
choice to stay unknown and not to publish their photo somewhere, so I guess we
should respect their privacy.
Also I
don’t think it is strange that Profit Booster has an infomercial like many
other products (and PB is a product, just a market-oriented one). To what
conclusion did I come? We have some rivals who still cannot settle down.
Instead of enjoying their own results and living their own lives they poke
their noses into things made for those who are able to appreciate them.
To take
this article (and similar articles of the same level) seriously or not – is
just your choice. I prefer to see the facts.
The review
began with words “If I had a million
dollars, what would I do? - Surely this is a question that everyone has asked
themselves at one point or another.” Yes, I won’t deny – we also
asked this question. Moreover we did something to give a decent answer and to
deal with it. That’s why we took a risk and tried something new when the others
were afraid. And I don’t see anything shameful in it.
As always I would finish my article saying it was just my humble opinion. But something tells me I’m not alone in it. Good luck!
